Peer Review Policy

Peer Review Policy

Al-Qalam Al-Moner Journal regards the peer-review process as the cornerstone of academic quality. We strictly adhere to a Double-Blind Peer Review system to ensure an objective, unbiased, and rigorous evaluation.

Principles of Peer Review:

• Double-Blind System: Identities of both authors and reviewers are kept anonymous throughout the process to ensure evaluations are based solely on scientific merit.

• Expert Selection: Reviewers are selected based on their specific expertise in Humanities or Applied Sciences and their proven research track record.

Core Evaluation Criteria:

• Originality: The novelty and significance of the research contribution.

• Methodology: The rigor, clarity, and appropriateness of the scientific methods used.

• Results & Discussion: Accuracy of the analysis and how well the data supports the conclusions.

• Integrity: Proper citation, reference accuracy, and adherence to ethical research standards.

Editorial Decision:

Based on the detailed reports, reviewers recommend: (1) Accept as is, (2) Accept with minor/major revisions, or (3) Reject. In cases of conflicting reviews, the editorial board appoints a third (tie-breaker) reviewer to ensure a fair and definitive final decision.